Sony

Drinker’s Chasers – Concord Loses $100 Million, Where

Drinker’s Chasers – Concord Loses $100 Million, Where Was The Modern Audience?

#Drinkers #Chasers #Concord #Loses #Million

“Critical Drinker After Hours”

Its become one of the biggest financial disasters in gaming history, losing more than $100 Million. Concord, Sony’s new first …

source

 

To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below

Related Articles

46 Comments

  1. Strange that these game devs don't understand that players – both man and female like attractive characters – that's because players are projecting into the characters. Few people actually want to play the game in projecting as a BP ugg woman. Actually – the devs used to understand that.

  2. subverting the male gaze is such a lame thought process to have, I saw somewhere where a developer said that they were “trying to save characters from the rule 34 artist” lmaoo how pathetic that that’s what you think about while creating. who cares??? depraved reddit mfs are still going to beat off to it regardless. they want to subvert the male gaze but have no problem having male eye candy in their game. i’m all for representation but it’s so hypocritical and toxic they just reversed everything they hated and did the same bigoted ideology except it serves them

  3. Personally, I think the games failure is more about the fact that they tried to make a hero shooter in a saturated market with nearly zero uniqueness or novelty. Like, let's assume they made really appealing characters, do you really think the game is going to attract gamers from playing all of the other hero shooters out there? Maybe it gets more people to try it for a day or two but there just isn't any "stickiness" from the mechanics or game modes. Personally, I saw the trailer for this game and I thought, "this is an overwatch rip off". And when I looked closer I realized, "oh it's an overwatch ripoff with less fun game modes and mechanics." IMO, the unappealing characters are whatever the opposite of "Icing on the cake" is and this game would fail anyways.

  4. Just a theory but… Movies and television are run and created by weird drama nerds and theater kids (I’m a former theater kid and they definitely act and think differently from the norm). They are surrounded by an echo chamber of people who act and think similarly and are generally outside the mainstream. While gamers are a much broader group of people from wildly different backgrounds and interests. They thought they would have the same success in games. We (gamers) are tired of ideologically driven games. We just want entertainment and escapism, not lectures and propaganda.

  5. the gap between the expert evaluation from the so called journalists and the audience ratings shows the degree of elite delusion and entitlement not popular intelligence. the same thing happened in 16 when Trump was elected.

  6. I'm sorry, but "Professor"? What's their Ph.D in? (Mine's in physics, BTW) When I taught as an adjunct years ago, I always asked the university students to either call me by my first name or as "coach."

  7. Not sure if this was mentioned, but the character with the blue coat? Not a woman. That's supposed to be a fat dude. And before you ask, yes, several characters are intended to be gender ambiguous.

  8. The sad thing about this whole Concord and Dustborn situation is that the latter was made by using taxpayers money, and the former is the reason why a PS5 pro will cost £700
    One way or another, they will get their money for these games and we lose.

  9. Nice of the video to get the disinformation out of the way early. Acting as if no one expected a game with zero marketing, a dumb price tag in an over saturated market was expected to be successful. This game was dead on arrival when it was announced.

    But sure, it’s cause you can’t masterbate to the characters. That’s why this failed. 😂😂😂

  10. I know that SONY is worth almost as much as Disney AND is trading at a higher share than Disney but…at what point are THEY going to be like: "Hey…let's get back to MAKING money!"???

  11. The other side of the coin is just as crazy. If you put out an anti-woke game, you will see massive success. We are literally in a market where all you have to do is make a traditional game and you will be rich. Wish I was a game designer.

  12. 7:518:05 “Why would you think a disabled person would want to be disabled in the game? … Someone could just tip him over and he's kinda fucked.”

    I am a disabled person who would be fucked if tipped over. I laughed so hard at that.

    I never look at games and think, "Can I play as a cripple?" I don't look to games for representation. I look to games for escape. I already have constant reminders of my struggles in my daily life, I don't need them in my games as well.

Leave a Reply