Sony

Exploring Sony’s Intriguing 8K CineAlta Camera!!

Exploring Sony’s Intriguing 8K CineAlta Camera!!

#Exploring #Sonys #Intriguing #CineAlta #Camera

“CVP”

Comment – Let us know what you think of the Sony BURANO down below! Order here – Subscribe …

source

 

To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below

Related Articles

42 Comments

  1. I would love to see the the color science against the FS7. Can we use our old FS as B cams or will it be to different? BTW I would just rent it for some night shots. I understand the price for the features, but why the IR pollution and slow readout speeds? Also this feels a bit like a risk to bring it to a fully paid project. I'd rather go with a Nikon 😅

  2. Personally, while the dual native ISO is great to have on this camera, and the IBIS could be nice, I'd rather keep using the Blackmagic URSA 12K OLPF and not have cropped sensor in different resolutions while having MUCH better rolling shutter performance and up to 120fps in 8K raw. For a camera that is 4 times the cost of the URSA, this Sony does not impress…

    Great info and review though as always!

  3. So I just upgraded from 3 LUMIX G85’s to 3 Buranos. This is my first time shooting on anything bigger than a micro 4/3 sensor. I thought my existing lenses would work but they don’t fit. It’s quite a bit over whelming. I do miss the LUMIX menus and the weight. However, despite that I am so glad these cameras have AWB as I am still learning how to nail perfect WB as some of my shots lean blue-ish and almost purple-ish at times.

    Despite my challenges, I am really looking forward to learning these cameras with the new lenses that the awesome B&H customer rep suggested. Didn’t know cine lenses could be so expensive! However, it comes with 5 prime lenses (T-stop, idk what the difference between this and F stop) and a hard shell traveling case which I found interesting. 🤔

    If you need a videographer in the Ellis, Idaho area, please feel free to reach out to me. My rates includes 3 cameras angle shots for 80$ an hour. Final edits are burned onto a CD at no additional cost. Looking forward to posting my review soon maybe in the summer.

  4. Wait… If you're able to make a VF extension cable for the FX6, wouldn't you then also be able to make a VF to XLR adapter cable that plugs into the FX6 body and allows XLR sound utilization without the use of the stock top handle? I've seen countless people (including myself) wonder about this in the FX6 Users group page!

  5. The Burano feels rushed a bit. It's crazy because Sony has had perfect releases these last few years. A7SIII, FX9, FX6, FX3, FX30.
    All those accessories should come in the box at $25K, including the Side Handle w/ the extension and top Handle.
    Camera read-out speeds should also be perfect in 2024 as the processing power is there.

  6. Im sorry, but $25,000 is just batshit for this.

    Sony needs to swallow their pride and start selling this camera for what it actually is: An FX9 replacemet.

    This is a $15,000 camera. Not $25,000.

  7. 350 pounds for sla printed 10 quid worth of plastic and a couple of hinges..? you really can get away with anything in overpriced "cinema" camera industry eh.

  8. The Canon C700 FF (Full Frame) is a MUCH BETTER CAMERA! Cheaper too! It's not 8K but with modern A.I. image resampling technology, that is no longer an issue for Cinema production usage! Plus I recently heard Canon is putting out NEW versions that are truly DCI-8K resolution at 8192 by 4320 pixels for the C500 Mk2 and C700 cameras at the upcoming NAB 2024 show WITHOUT ANY CRIPPLE HAMMERS which will pretty much put the Sony cameras to shame!

    Even the Canon EOS R5 mk2 camera is FAR BETTER than this one and it shoots at 8K and is less than $7000 USD !!!

    Just rig it properly for Cinema Production use!

    V

  9. For future reviews, you guys should really do a little more pixel peeping on the different modes to know how much detail it's actually resolving. The 6K crop mode has a little under UHD detail level from what I can tell. It matches my FX6 internal codec (FX6 raw is actually sharper). It's currently just a big waste of data, but the only option to do any fps over 30 in FF. I'd rather have a 4K downsample from 8K that's super detailed and can get faster frame rates (and maybe RS).

  10. After the initial reviews, I think the Burano is really situated in an odd place regarding its price point and features. Most doc and low to mid tier projects will be satisfied with FX9 + FX6 quality, and sure, having a Burano on those projects with X-OCN codec will be nice, but are they willing to shell out higher rental rates to use the Burano? And for higher-end productions in commercials and narratives, why would one choose a Burano if they likely have a budget to use the Venice or Alexa instead? Now that the Burano’s specs are more known, overall it’s not as exciting of a camera as I previously thought. It would be nice to have as an owner-operator, but I feel it’s a tough sell to clients + productions

  11. With all the negative, I think I'll buy a red dragon 6k for a 1/4 the cost and have just as good, if not better, of an image! Then again, I am a poor hobby filmmaker, so there's that!

  12. Nikon buys Red…stay tuned for the next big battles Sony vs. Red vs. Arri. Probably a few years away. I've used the original Venice and it was really nice. Apparently the II is even nicer and this camera is close. Will we see a global 4/6k camera with 16 real world stops?

  13. Sony: people love the a7rv. I bet we could package it in a magnesium box, put a cine badge on it and charge 8x more for it. Of course we will give them some extras, internals nd’s and x-ocn.
    Actually, scratch the x-ocn.
    Eh screw it, give em x-ocn but LT only. Tell them cf Xpress type B cards can’t handle anything higher if they complain.
    Consumers: what about open gate, will it have it?
    Sony: well unfortunately our $2k cameras don’t have that yet and we wouldn’t want to step on their toes..
    I really wanted this camera at launch… shame.

  14. Sub-par readout speeds at anything over 4K, IR pollution, no open gate… What are we even doing here… could buy a Kinefinity camera and get far broader capabilities with a great image, or 1/2to 1/3 of the price…

  15. Why did you warp stabilise the footage – looked terrible motion artifact-wise – i wouldve left it as is or omitted it….says very little for your trust for the "stabilized sensor"

  16. Reminds me of back in the later days of 1080p video production. I wrestled with this almost exact same problem with the Sony PMW-EX1, a great run and gun camera of its time that was ktherwise weighed down with the IR pollution problem. Not until about halfway of its life I got a similar IR cut filter recommended by the online community and was able to get rid of that awful magenta/brown cast on some sensitive black fabrics with only a minor color shift. Never had the same problem, or at least a similar problem to the same extent, with the other cameras I have used from the CCD Sonys, and the Canons with 1/3" sensors to fullframe. Strange.

Leave a Reply