Canon
Tesla Model 3 RWD Highland vs MG4 charging battle
Tesla Model 3 RWD Highland vs MG4 charging battle
#Tesla #Model #RWD #Highland #MG4 #charging #battle
“Bjørn Nyland”
Get 30 day free Premium trial on ABRP by using referral code “Teslabjorn”:
Want to sell your Tesla/EV?
Want to buy a Tesla/EV?…
source
To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below |
😂😂😂😂 What a sport race 😂😂😂😂
Hi TB
Great vid as always. Instead of comparing soc it would be more important to compare how many kwh(/h…🫠) the cars has changed. Even more important how many kilometers the cars batteries are able to put back into the cars as this is the final result that actually matters for users/owners 👍(average consumption/kwh in battery)
Br from DK
Really funny these charging speed "competitions" between manufactures and models.
Maybe in these videos could be a plus if is added the charging time from the starting SoC of 10%?
I saw that from 10% to 80%, Tesla and MG needed 25ish minutes.
That's a good speed.
The MG4 seems to be over reporting SOC at the start of the charging session; it's peaking at ~135kw but shows almost the same SOC when the Teslas' charge tapers to 135kw.
my 22 M3 LFP is amazing.
Looking forward to seeing the comparison between Volvo EX30 LFP 51kWh vs Tesla M3 vs Jeep Avenger
In only my opinion is the super small peak of the Tesla's ridiculous
The model 3 highland is the RWD one? Kinda low range comparing with Long Range which shows 440 km at 80% and 550 at 100%.
90% is nonsense. Especially for this slow-chargers. 80% is standard.
MG 4 won to 80%, curve shows good result and it's 64kw.
I have 2022 SR+ 60kwh LFP and my charging curve is better then You shown us. Like You mention update of software boost a litle charging speed. MG4 have 64kwh battery , if test will be fair You should show how many kwh car take it to 90% and efficiency ist very important. MG have better charging speed and slightly bigger battery but week efficiency. Then Tesla win. My SR LFP shock me i like it very much. You should put MY LFP with Blade battery to this competition 😅
on my 2023 RWD Model 3 with LFP battery, I still get a little over 40kw at 95% SOC. This is on an American made (Fremont CA) in Canada either on a supercharger or other public CCS level 3 chargers. 98%… and still at 30kW
Question. Why do you think the Highland is the winner ? Well, if we do the math, the Higland charged to 90% which will be 54kWh, the MG4 charged in the same time 89% which equals to 57 kWh.
So the MG4 put more juice in to the Battery at the same time and is for me the clear winner. But, as we can see, the Highland is at 53.5 kWh at 90%, it misses 500 W, thats for the reason how the batterymanagment calculates the percentage value, which depends on temperature and other enviroment factors. So why do you choose percentage over real kWh loaded in the battery for your charging tests ? Does the MG4 not give you these values?
❤❤❤
Hmm 🤔 is Bjørn sitting in an Xpeng G6?
Hmm temperature on mg4 battery was not impressive -cold gating or not possible to set heating like on Tesla for optimal charging temperature ?which you was saying is around 40 degrees when starting to charge the car on 1000km challenge
You could add a test with the new Volvo EX30 51 kWh with LFP 🙂
In my experience mg4 lr will stop charging at 97% on DC chargers refuses to charger higher
You got to use a ioniq 5 58kw (Lfp) you will be amazed with the charging curve.
Mg4 for the win (just jump to next charger)
My model 3 from July 2023 has the same charging curve as the highland, even a bit higher. 101kw at 50% from 10-80% instead of 95kw.
Would love to see a test of an “older” M3
LFP to see how it’s aged
I will remember this when my MG4 SE with LFP is rolling along at 80kw 😂 stress free charging just chilled out
Lets do some math:
If you charge the Highland from 10% to only 50% you get about 22.5kWh in 12min which translates into 150km of range at 150Wh/km. The average C rate is 2.
Charging from 10% to 80% takes 27min and you get 39.4kWh or 263km of range at 150Wh/km. The average C rate slows down to 1.56.
If you don't charge deep, the charging speed of the standard range Highland is quite impressive due to the 170kW peak in the beginning. But I would like to see that sustained for longer in upcoming Tesla vehicles.
@ V4 supercharger our M3 SR 2023 (LFP) recently got this charging speed: 155 kW @ 40% SoC and 130 kW @ 53% SoC. ☺️
M3 RWD would be the first choice and recommendation. It's a shame that because M3 is imported, the Model Y is sometimes better priced in Europe.
The RWD Highland battery tech is awesome compared to my previous LR tech. Always charging it to 100%, and after 9700 kilometers, the estimated degradation is 0.91%, or 4 kilometers. And on SuC I have over 80kW charging speeds after 80% SoC.
I'm happy I didn't wait this long for the RWD review
Charging faster at higher states of charge does seem to be an LFP benefit. My BYD Dolphin will pull 1-1.5C up to 85%, then drop to 0.5C till 95%, then 0.25C to 100%. It takes the pressure off optimising charging stops
I love my BYD, has not disappointed me in the least.
I would like to see a test of the Renault Scenic e-tech😎
Btw Bjorn Tesla unlocked 350kw charging in some chargers in the US, can't wait to see them roll that out everywhere 😂
Great video
Is there a test out there yet for Ex30 LFP?
I love my Highland RWD! Thank you Björn!
1